Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Monday, August 23, 2010
Sunday, August 8, 2010
What Church Should Be
What Church Should Be
Acts 2:41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added [unto them] about three thousand souls. 42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. 43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. 44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all [men], as every man had need. 46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, 47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
I. A Preaching Church
A. God Prescribed Preaching
B. God Powered Preaching I Corinthians 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
C. God Pleasing Preaching I Corinthians 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
II. A Persistent Church vs 46
A. In Continuing in one accord
B. In Contributing. Acts 2:44
C. In Conflict
D. In Communion
III. A Perfecting Church
A. Praying Church Acts 2:42 Acts 2:42
B. Praising Church Acts 2:47 Psalm 150
C. Proselytizing Church Acts 20:20 And how I kept back nothing that was profitable [unto you], but have shewed you, and have taught you publickly, and from house to house,
D. Prevailing Church the Lord added Matthew 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
October 5, 2003 Sunday Night, Mendez; apg August 8, 2010sn
Acts 2:41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added [unto them] about three thousand souls. 42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. 43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. 44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all [men], as every man had need. 46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, 47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
I. A Preaching Church
A. God Prescribed Preaching
B. God Powered Preaching I Corinthians 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
C. God Pleasing Preaching I Corinthians 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
II. A Persistent Church vs 46
A. In Continuing in one accord
B. In Contributing. Acts 2:44
C. In Conflict
D. In Communion
III. A Perfecting Church
A. Praying Church Acts 2:42 Acts 2:42
B. Praising Church Acts 2:47 Psalm 150
C. Proselytizing Church Acts 20:20 And how I kept back nothing that was profitable [unto you], but have shewed you, and have taught you publickly, and from house to house,
D. Prevailing Church the Lord added Matthew 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
October 5, 2003 Sunday Night, Mendez; apg August 8, 2010sn
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Criminal Charges and Immigration
Being charged with a crime is always scary. There is a lot at stake if you are found guilty. This could mar your reputation and record for the rest of your life. It could limit your liberties and hold you back from doing what others take for granted.
The stakes are even higher, though, if you are trying to come to America or become a citizen. This is because Criminal Prosecution can make things very difficult for an alien (see: 8 USC 1182(a)(2) INA section 212(a)(2); 8 USC 1227(a)(2), INA section 237(a)(2)). The law says that a person who has committed a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CIMT) can be deemed inadmissible to the United States.
This kind of crime (CIMT) will be a bar to an alien who wants to enter the United States under section 212(a)(2)(i)(I) on the INA (Immigration Nationality Act). For example, crimes involving controlled substances receive harsh treatment under the INA. (212(a)(2)(i)(II) of the INA.)
A serious crime can make it impossible for a person to get into the United States. This bar to admission applies to aliens who are not permanent residents, illegal aliens, or individuals outside of the country. It can also make it impossible for resident aliens to get permanent residence in the United States.
There are a few different areas of crime that can be considered to involve Moral Turpitude:
• Crimes Against The Person
• Crimes Against Property
• Sexual and Family Crimes
• Crimes Against the Authority of Government
Not every crime in these areas will become a bar to you, but they could. To determine if a criminal charge against you could be considered a CIMT, you should consider contacting an Immigration Attorney to protect your rights.
In general, these CIMT’s are crimes where the penalty is at least one year or more. Under immigration law, the idea of moral turpitude has been interpreted very broadly. It is defined on a case law basis and has been applied to many things. This makes it hard sometimes to know for sure what will be a CIMT and what will not be. These crimes could be any fraud, theft, burglary, robbery, murder, manslaughter, income tax evasion, assaults with weapons, domestic violence, conspiracy related crimes, and drug trafficking.
If the crime has a penalty less than a year, there might not be a problem if there is a only one criminal conviction. This could be drunk driving, retail fraud, or simple assaults. The big exception to this is domestic violence. Yet even if it is less than a year, the impact could still be severe because immigration officials have such broad powers.
There is a often surprising problem when it comes to one of these crimes. Even though the criminal prosecution of the crime may not be that big of a deal to you at the time, it might have a much bigger impact on your Immigration Status.
You might be charged with felony theft, for example. You plead to a misdemeanor. You might pay a fine, but no jail time. It does not seem like a big deal because that is the end of it. While that might be the end for Criminal purposes, it might not be the end for Immigration. It could stop you from changing your status or renewing your Visa.
You say, “But it was not a felony.” You need to understand, the Immigration official has broad latitude in enforcing these guidelines. He could determine that the facts that you plead to still equate to a felony even though the court only called it a misdemeanor. He could say it is still a CIMT. It could still be a bar.
Most courts, prosecutors, and even criminal defense attorneys do not understand how powerful the immigration official is. They do not understand that the immigrations officials have a lot of discretion that they can exercise. Many people are later hurt after a prosecution because they took a plea that they thought was safe. Years later, they find out that some immigration official calls the petty crime of shop lifting (for example) a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude.
Let us assume that you have been accused of felony theft. This would definitely be a CIMT. But you plead to trespass to chattels. This is not usually a CIMT. But be careful that you do not admit in the proceedings to any actions that establish the elements of felony theft. This is important. Later, the Immigration Official could look at what you pled to and call it a CIMT.
Because most non-Immigration Attorneys do not understand how serious this is, you need to consider hiring an Immigration Attorney to work with your Criminal Attorney if you are involved in any theft crime, dishonesty crime, violence crime, etc.
If you are considering taking a plea, discuss with an Immigration Attorney if that type of crime is ever considered a CIMT. And if you take a plea, be careful that you do not plead guilty to any facts that amount to a CIMT.
Finally, just because you are found guilty of a CIMT, it does not mean that you have no way to fight it for immigration purposes. No, there are ways to get past that, but that process can become difficult. It is better to avoid it altogether if at all possible.
The stakes are even higher, though, if you are trying to come to America or become a citizen. This is because Criminal Prosecution can make things very difficult for an alien (see: 8 USC 1182(a)(2) INA section 212(a)(2); 8 USC 1227(a)(2), INA section 237(a)(2)). The law says that a person who has committed a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CIMT) can be deemed inadmissible to the United States.
This kind of crime (CIMT) will be a bar to an alien who wants to enter the United States under section 212(a)(2)(i)(I) on the INA (Immigration Nationality Act). For example, crimes involving controlled substances receive harsh treatment under the INA. (212(a)(2)(i)(II) of the INA.)
A serious crime can make it impossible for a person to get into the United States. This bar to admission applies to aliens who are not permanent residents, illegal aliens, or individuals outside of the country. It can also make it impossible for resident aliens to get permanent residence in the United States.
There are a few different areas of crime that can be considered to involve Moral Turpitude:
• Crimes Against The Person
• Crimes Against Property
• Sexual and Family Crimes
• Crimes Against the Authority of Government
Not every crime in these areas will become a bar to you, but they could. To determine if a criminal charge against you could be considered a CIMT, you should consider contacting an Immigration Attorney to protect your rights.
In general, these CIMT’s are crimes where the penalty is at least one year or more. Under immigration law, the idea of moral turpitude has been interpreted very broadly. It is defined on a case law basis and has been applied to many things. This makes it hard sometimes to know for sure what will be a CIMT and what will not be. These crimes could be any fraud, theft, burglary, robbery, murder, manslaughter, income tax evasion, assaults with weapons, domestic violence, conspiracy related crimes, and drug trafficking.
If the crime has a penalty less than a year, there might not be a problem if there is a only one criminal conviction. This could be drunk driving, retail fraud, or simple assaults. The big exception to this is domestic violence. Yet even if it is less than a year, the impact could still be severe because immigration officials have such broad powers.
There is a often surprising problem when it comes to one of these crimes. Even though the criminal prosecution of the crime may not be that big of a deal to you at the time, it might have a much bigger impact on your Immigration Status.
You might be charged with felony theft, for example. You plead to a misdemeanor. You might pay a fine, but no jail time. It does not seem like a big deal because that is the end of it. While that might be the end for Criminal purposes, it might not be the end for Immigration. It could stop you from changing your status or renewing your Visa.
You say, “But it was not a felony.” You need to understand, the Immigration official has broad latitude in enforcing these guidelines. He could determine that the facts that you plead to still equate to a felony even though the court only called it a misdemeanor. He could say it is still a CIMT. It could still be a bar.
Most courts, prosecutors, and even criminal defense attorneys do not understand how powerful the immigration official is. They do not understand that the immigrations officials have a lot of discretion that they can exercise. Many people are later hurt after a prosecution because they took a plea that they thought was safe. Years later, they find out that some immigration official calls the petty crime of shop lifting (for example) a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude.
Let us assume that you have been accused of felony theft. This would definitely be a CIMT. But you plead to trespass to chattels. This is not usually a CIMT. But be careful that you do not admit in the proceedings to any actions that establish the elements of felony theft. This is important. Later, the Immigration Official could look at what you pled to and call it a CIMT.
Because most non-Immigration Attorneys do not understand how serious this is, you need to consider hiring an Immigration Attorney to work with your Criminal Attorney if you are involved in any theft crime, dishonesty crime, violence crime, etc.
If you are considering taking a plea, discuss with an Immigration Attorney if that type of crime is ever considered a CIMT. And if you take a plea, be careful that you do not plead guilty to any facts that amount to a CIMT.
Finally, just because you are found guilty of a CIMT, it does not mean that you have no way to fight it for immigration purposes. No, there are ways to get past that, but that process can become difficult. It is better to avoid it altogether if at all possible.
Monday, August 2, 2010
Problems with Unemployment
Legal Mumbo Jumbo on the Decision Letter
• UIA: Unemployment Insurance Agency
• ALJ: Administrative Law Judge.
• Appeal/Docket Number: This is the number the Office of Appeals uses to keep track of your case. You can find it on the top right corner of your Notice of Hearing.
• Claimant: That is you. You filed a claim for Unemployment.
• Jurisdiction: The ALJ has to go through these details of what the Unemployment Insurance Agency did before getting to hearing stage.
• Statement of Facts: This is the section where the ALJ tells you what he thinks happened. This is important because his determination of facts will guide the decision.
• Issues: This is the part where the ALJ lists the rules that control his decision. It has a lot of mumbo jumbo about what the laws say and how the laws have been interpreted.
• Reasoning and Conclusion: This is a very important. It tells what the ALJ believes to be the truth and why he decided the way he did.
• Order: It is the section where the ALJ orders the Unemployment to do or not do something. “Claimant is not disqualified. . .” “Claimant is not eligible. . .”
What is the Bottom Line?
Click edit above to add content to this empty capsule.
You have gone to your Hearing. You have answered all the questions. You have hoped and prayed for the answer you need.
So, what is next?
It usually takes about a week for the ALJ to mail out his decision. There is basically three ways that the ALJ can rule. Firstly, He can say that you should get your unemployment. In this case, the Order will say, “Claimant is not disqualified . . .” Or in some cases it may use the word “Eligible.” This means he found for you. You win!
The second way he may go is, “Claimant is disqualified . . .” or “Claimant is not eligible. . .” This means that the Employer wins.
The third option is more rare. In some cases, the ALJ may split his decision. He may say you get your benefits for some weeks and not for others.
What is next if the ALJ finds for you?
The ALJ will send his decision letter to several places. He sends you, the Claimant, a copy. He sends the Employer a copy. He sends a copy to your Attorney/Agent (if you have one). If the Employer had an Attorney, he will also get a copy.
So, the most important place that the ALJ will send the decision letter is to the Unemployment Agency. At the same time he sends it out to the parties, he also sends it to the UIA. They then start to process it. I do not know what happens in this dark and murky place of bureaucracy other than a few things that I have been told. The UIA goes through their process of reversing the benefits.
The question is always, “How long does it take to get the money after the ALJ decides the case for me?” The answer is different for different people. I would guess that the average for most people is that it usually takes a couple of weeks from the time of the decision. That guess is based on what I have heard from Claimants. If it takes the ALJ takes about a week to issue the letter, then the agency takes about a week to process the benefits, that is about two weeks.
The fact is though that sometimes the ALJ gets the decision out in the mail the very next day, or sometimes it takes a couple of weeks to get the decision. Sometimes the UIA takes longer to process, or they process very quickly. So, sometimes people get their benefits promptly. But sometimes, it seems to take for ever.
So, I guess my answer is, “Usually about two weeks, but you never know with bureaucracy.”
What’s next when it is against you?
You have gone to your Unemployment hearing for your benefits. You waited for about a week or so to get the ALJ’s decision. You sort though all kinds of legal mumbo jumbo. Then you read the disheartening words, “The Claimant is disqualified for his benefits. . .” If you do not want to fight any more you do not have to. But you need to understand that if you got paid any Unemployment Benefits, and the ALJ finds against you, you will be asked to pay back what you got.
If you want to appeal the decision, read the back page of the decision. It informs you of your rights of appeal. It also give you contact information for the MESC Board of Review.
If you disagree with the ALJ’s decision, you have two options. You can do one or both of them, or skip the first, and go right to the second.
I. Ask for a Re-Hearing.
Your First Option is to ask for a Re-Hearing. The option of a Rehearing is for when you have found that there is more information that you did not have or did not know that you needed for your first hearing.
This Re-Hearing option is not used most of the time. It is often hard to get the Re-Hearing granted. But I list if first because if you are going to do it, you want to do it before the Protest to the Board of Review.
Sometimes when you go to a hearing, even though you have prepared properly and done what you can. . . Sometimes you still find that you do not have all the information that you needed. Sometimes you do not know what the employer is going to say until they say it. Only during the hearing do you realize that you need information or a witness, and you had no way of knowing before then.
In this case, you can ask for a rehearing to get the information into the record so that the ALJ has all the information that he needs to make a fair decision. The trick is that you cannot get a rehearing if you knew or should have known that you might need the missing information before the hearing. If you should have known that you needed the info and did not have it, it is your loss. The ALJ will not give you a second shot.
You could get a rehearing if
1. You really did not know that you needed the information, and you had no way of knowing that you needed it.
2. Or, you had no access to the evidence until after the hearing.
A. First you must ask the ALJ for the Re-hearing.
To get the Re-Hearing you must first ask the ALJ for it. You cannot just go to the judge’s office and ask the secretary to get you a Re-Hearing. Nor can you do it by phone. You must do this in writing. You can do this by mailing a letter to the judge’s office, but I find that it is better to do it by fax. That way you can make sure that they did receive the Request.
The phone and fax numbers for the ALJ’s office should be on the notice of hearing. Or if you lose that, your Advocate that helped you with the hearing should have the number to the office.
What do you say in the Request for Re-Hearing?
You must have evidence that you did not have or did not know that you needed in the first hearing. Now, you realized that it was important.
• Tell him what the evidence was.
• Tell him why you did not know that you needed it in the first hearing.
• or, Tell him why the evidence may not have been available to you for the first hearing.
B. What if the Judge denies your Request for a Re-Hearing?
Some Judges are more likely than others to deny a Request for Re-Hearing. There is still one more chance if the ALJ denies the Request. You need to send the same request to the MESC Board of Review.
Take a copy of the first letter and attach a note saying, “The ALJ denied this request for a Re-hearing. I would like the Board of Review to order a Re-Hearing . . .”
Tell the Board why you believe that you did not have a chance to present your evidence
(1) Ignorance of the Fact
(2) Inability of Council (although I do not know if the Board will give this any weight)
(3) Ignorance of the issue. You did not know what it was until the hearing and/or ALJ’s decision.
The Board of Review is not going to consider evidence that was not given at the Hearing. That is why you need a Re-Hearing if there is more evidence that needs to be considered. The will only consider what evidence is introduced to the ALJ at the Hearing.
If you want more evidence to be considered you have to get a Re-Hearing.
II. If you disagree with the ALJ’s decision, your Second Option is to appeal to the MESC Board of Review.
You do not have to ask for a Re-Hearing. You can go directly to the second option of Appeal. Most people do. But even if you did ask for a Re-Hearing, and the Board denies the request, you can still protest the ALJ’s decision.
This is not another hearing. This is done by letter. You do not have to go anywhere or speak to anyone.
You simply write/fax a letter to the Board saying that you disagree and want to appeal the ALJ’s decision. I would suggest fax because you can then call the secretary and confirm that they received the Protest Letter.
To contact the MESC Board of Review:
• Voice Line: 800-738-6372
• Fax Line: 517-241-7326
•
While the letter asking for a Re-Hearing tends to be complicated, the Protest Letter does not need to be. It could be as simple as:
“I disagree with the Judge’s decision. I want to appeal it to the Board of Review.”
Of course, you need to include a few bits of information:
• You must include your Name.
• You should include the Date.
• You should include your full Social Security Number so that they know for sure who you are.
• It might help to give the ALJ’s name.
• It might help to give the Appeal/Docket Number from your hearing (B2010-45678 for example). You can find it on the top right corner of your Notice of Hearing.
• You need put your signature on the letter.
You can find the address to the Board of Review on the back page of you Decision Letter.
That is all you have to do to appeal the ALJ’s decision. You do not need to do anything more. It is free of charge. If you disagree with the ALJ, why would anyone not protest?
A. Additional options when you Protest the ALJ’s decision: Written Argument and Oral Argument.
You can after that use one of two other options but do not need to pursue either. They are extra, not necessary. These two options are Written Argument and Oral Argument. An argument is you telling the Board why they should find in your favor based on the facts submitted at the hearing.
When you protest a Decision, the Board prepares a transcript of the Hearing. They will send a copy of this to both parties. If you have an Advocate/Attorney, the transcript will go to him. You will still receive a letter stating that the transcript is prepared. This letter will also tell you what the deadline for any argument is.
An Argument is when tell the Board why the ALJ was right or wrong. You do not add any evidence to the record, but you take the existing testimony, exhibits, and facts and show the Board why the ALJ was wrong. Maybe you agree with the ALJ because he found in your favor. If the Employer appeals, you may want to argue why the ALJ was right.
If possible, you want to find other cases that are similar to yours. If there are cases like yours that the Claimant won, you will want to point those out the similarities between your case and that one. If there is a case that is similar to the facts of your case, but in that case they found against the Claimant, you want to show the differences in the cases.
You can ask for an Oral Argument. This is very rare. Someone told me that the Board only allows Oral Arguments about ten times a year. I do not know how accurate that estimate is, but that was what I was told by someone in the office.
An Oral Argument is “oral” meaning you make it in person and verbally. You would go before the Board and verbally tell them which way you want them to decide. They may ask you questions as to why you take your position.
If you ask for an Oral Argument, you may want to send written argument in support of the Oral Argument. The Written Argument will go through all of what you want to say. The reason that you would still want the Oral Argument is so that you can answer any questions the Board might have and verbally persuade them past their disagreements.
You can submit a Written Argument alone. This is more common. Most people do not do arguments at all. But those that do make arguments, it is usually a written argument.
For a Written Argument, I would suggest that you gave a few different parts.
1. You should start out by stating what you want to Board to do. “Please affirm the ALJ’s decsision. . .” Or “Please reverse the ALJ’s decision. . .”
2. Statement of Facts: You should include a Statement of Facts. In this section, you should take your story and tell it again in a way that will support your position. Of course, you must make sure that you keep to the facts that were actually shown at the hearing.
3. Issues: You should have an Issues section. “The issue is whether the ALJ was wrong when he . . .”
4. Reasoning: You should have an Reasoning or Argument section. In this section, you contrast or compare previous cases. You show your logic as to why the ALJ was right or wrong.
5. Conclusion: Wrap it up and briefly summarize why the Board should find in your favor.
If the Employer did not have an attorney, it is hard to make an argument. The problem is that the rules say that if they do not have an agent/attorney, you have to ask their permission for the Board to consider your argument.
If the Employer does have an agent/attorney, it is easier. All you have to do in that case is to send (1st class mail is okay) the attorney a copy of your argument before the deadline. Then you write a letter confirming that you did send a copy to the Employer. Include the date of when you sent it and how you sent it.
If the Employer did not have an agent/attorney, in my experience, there is no use in writing an argument because you cannot make the Employer agree to let the Board consider your argument. The Employer will probably just ignore your request. Why would they assist you? They want you to lose.
Unfortunately, the Advocacy Program does not pay for representation to the Board of Review. The Advocacy Program will pay for your hearing, but not past that stage. So you have some options. The First Option is to do nothing after you appeal to the Board. Once you have requested the Board to consider the ALJ’s decision, they will do that. You do not have to do anything else.
The Second Option if you want to have an argument is to write it yourself. You can get the transcript of your hearing either from the Board or from your agent/attorney.
The Third Option is hire someone to write it for you. I have no idea how much the average price of that is (I have spoken to me about prices that are much higher than me.) Ask your advocate/attorney if he is willing to write the argument for you, because not all Advocates do that kind of thing.
• UIA: Unemployment Insurance Agency
• ALJ: Administrative Law Judge.
• Appeal/Docket Number: This is the number the Office of Appeals uses to keep track of your case. You can find it on the top right corner of your Notice of Hearing.
• Claimant: That is you. You filed a claim for Unemployment.
• Jurisdiction: The ALJ has to go through these details of what the Unemployment Insurance Agency did before getting to hearing stage.
• Statement of Facts: This is the section where the ALJ tells you what he thinks happened. This is important because his determination of facts will guide the decision.
• Issues: This is the part where the ALJ lists the rules that control his decision. It has a lot of mumbo jumbo about what the laws say and how the laws have been interpreted.
• Reasoning and Conclusion: This is a very important. It tells what the ALJ believes to be the truth and why he decided the way he did.
• Order: It is the section where the ALJ orders the Unemployment to do or not do something. “Claimant is not disqualified. . .” “Claimant is not eligible. . .”
What is the Bottom Line?
Click edit above to add content to this empty capsule.
You have gone to your Hearing. You have answered all the questions. You have hoped and prayed for the answer you need.
So, what is next?
It usually takes about a week for the ALJ to mail out his decision. There is basically three ways that the ALJ can rule. Firstly, He can say that you should get your unemployment. In this case, the Order will say, “Claimant is not disqualified . . .” Or in some cases it may use the word “Eligible.” This means he found for you. You win!
The second way he may go is, “Claimant is disqualified . . .” or “Claimant is not eligible. . .” This means that the Employer wins.
The third option is more rare. In some cases, the ALJ may split his decision. He may say you get your benefits for some weeks and not for others.
What is next if the ALJ finds for you?
The ALJ will send his decision letter to several places. He sends you, the Claimant, a copy. He sends the Employer a copy. He sends a copy to your Attorney/Agent (if you have one). If the Employer had an Attorney, he will also get a copy.
So, the most important place that the ALJ will send the decision letter is to the Unemployment Agency. At the same time he sends it out to the parties, he also sends it to the UIA. They then start to process it. I do not know what happens in this dark and murky place of bureaucracy other than a few things that I have been told. The UIA goes through their process of reversing the benefits.
The question is always, “How long does it take to get the money after the ALJ decides the case for me?” The answer is different for different people. I would guess that the average for most people is that it usually takes a couple of weeks from the time of the decision. That guess is based on what I have heard from Claimants. If it takes the ALJ takes about a week to issue the letter, then the agency takes about a week to process the benefits, that is about two weeks.
The fact is though that sometimes the ALJ gets the decision out in the mail the very next day, or sometimes it takes a couple of weeks to get the decision. Sometimes the UIA takes longer to process, or they process very quickly. So, sometimes people get their benefits promptly. But sometimes, it seems to take for ever.
So, I guess my answer is, “Usually about two weeks, but you never know with bureaucracy.”
What’s next when it is against you?
You have gone to your Unemployment hearing for your benefits. You waited for about a week or so to get the ALJ’s decision. You sort though all kinds of legal mumbo jumbo. Then you read the disheartening words, “The Claimant is disqualified for his benefits. . .” If you do not want to fight any more you do not have to. But you need to understand that if you got paid any Unemployment Benefits, and the ALJ finds against you, you will be asked to pay back what you got.
If you want to appeal the decision, read the back page of the decision. It informs you of your rights of appeal. It also give you contact information for the MESC Board of Review.
If you disagree with the ALJ’s decision, you have two options. You can do one or both of them, or skip the first, and go right to the second.
I. Ask for a Re-Hearing.
Your First Option is to ask for a Re-Hearing. The option of a Rehearing is for when you have found that there is more information that you did not have or did not know that you needed for your first hearing.
This Re-Hearing option is not used most of the time. It is often hard to get the Re-Hearing granted. But I list if first because if you are going to do it, you want to do it before the Protest to the Board of Review.
Sometimes when you go to a hearing, even though you have prepared properly and done what you can. . . Sometimes you still find that you do not have all the information that you needed. Sometimes you do not know what the employer is going to say until they say it. Only during the hearing do you realize that you need information or a witness, and you had no way of knowing before then.
In this case, you can ask for a rehearing to get the information into the record so that the ALJ has all the information that he needs to make a fair decision. The trick is that you cannot get a rehearing if you knew or should have known that you might need the missing information before the hearing. If you should have known that you needed the info and did not have it, it is your loss. The ALJ will not give you a second shot.
You could get a rehearing if
1. You really did not know that you needed the information, and you had no way of knowing that you needed it.
2. Or, you had no access to the evidence until after the hearing.
A. First you must ask the ALJ for the Re-hearing.
To get the Re-Hearing you must first ask the ALJ for it. You cannot just go to the judge’s office and ask the secretary to get you a Re-Hearing. Nor can you do it by phone. You must do this in writing. You can do this by mailing a letter to the judge’s office, but I find that it is better to do it by fax. That way you can make sure that they did receive the Request.
The phone and fax numbers for the ALJ’s office should be on the notice of hearing. Or if you lose that, your Advocate that helped you with the hearing should have the number to the office.
What do you say in the Request for Re-Hearing?
You must have evidence that you did not have or did not know that you needed in the first hearing. Now, you realized that it was important.
• Tell him what the evidence was.
• Tell him why you did not know that you needed it in the first hearing.
• or, Tell him why the evidence may not have been available to you for the first hearing.
B. What if the Judge denies your Request for a Re-Hearing?
Some Judges are more likely than others to deny a Request for Re-Hearing. There is still one more chance if the ALJ denies the Request. You need to send the same request to the MESC Board of Review.
Take a copy of the first letter and attach a note saying, “The ALJ denied this request for a Re-hearing. I would like the Board of Review to order a Re-Hearing . . .”
Tell the Board why you believe that you did not have a chance to present your evidence
(1) Ignorance of the Fact
(2) Inability of Council (although I do not know if the Board will give this any weight)
(3) Ignorance of the issue. You did not know what it was until the hearing and/or ALJ’s decision.
The Board of Review is not going to consider evidence that was not given at the Hearing. That is why you need a Re-Hearing if there is more evidence that needs to be considered. The will only consider what evidence is introduced to the ALJ at the Hearing.
If you want more evidence to be considered you have to get a Re-Hearing.
II. If you disagree with the ALJ’s decision, your Second Option is to appeal to the MESC Board of Review.
You do not have to ask for a Re-Hearing. You can go directly to the second option of Appeal. Most people do. But even if you did ask for a Re-Hearing, and the Board denies the request, you can still protest the ALJ’s decision.
This is not another hearing. This is done by letter. You do not have to go anywhere or speak to anyone.
You simply write/fax a letter to the Board saying that you disagree and want to appeal the ALJ’s decision. I would suggest fax because you can then call the secretary and confirm that they received the Protest Letter.
To contact the MESC Board of Review:
• Voice Line: 800-738-6372
• Fax Line: 517-241-7326
•
While the letter asking for a Re-Hearing tends to be complicated, the Protest Letter does not need to be. It could be as simple as:
“I disagree with the Judge’s decision. I want to appeal it to the Board of Review.”
Of course, you need to include a few bits of information:
• You must include your Name.
• You should include the Date.
• You should include your full Social Security Number so that they know for sure who you are.
• It might help to give the ALJ’s name.
• It might help to give the Appeal/Docket Number from your hearing (B2010-45678 for example). You can find it on the top right corner of your Notice of Hearing.
• You need put your signature on the letter.
You can find the address to the Board of Review on the back page of you Decision Letter.
That is all you have to do to appeal the ALJ’s decision. You do not need to do anything more. It is free of charge. If you disagree with the ALJ, why would anyone not protest?
A. Additional options when you Protest the ALJ’s decision: Written Argument and Oral Argument.
You can after that use one of two other options but do not need to pursue either. They are extra, not necessary. These two options are Written Argument and Oral Argument. An argument is you telling the Board why they should find in your favor based on the facts submitted at the hearing.
When you protest a Decision, the Board prepares a transcript of the Hearing. They will send a copy of this to both parties. If you have an Advocate/Attorney, the transcript will go to him. You will still receive a letter stating that the transcript is prepared. This letter will also tell you what the deadline for any argument is.
An Argument is when tell the Board why the ALJ was right or wrong. You do not add any evidence to the record, but you take the existing testimony, exhibits, and facts and show the Board why the ALJ was wrong. Maybe you agree with the ALJ because he found in your favor. If the Employer appeals, you may want to argue why the ALJ was right.
If possible, you want to find other cases that are similar to yours. If there are cases like yours that the Claimant won, you will want to point those out the similarities between your case and that one. If there is a case that is similar to the facts of your case, but in that case they found against the Claimant, you want to show the differences in the cases.
You can ask for an Oral Argument. This is very rare. Someone told me that the Board only allows Oral Arguments about ten times a year. I do not know how accurate that estimate is, but that was what I was told by someone in the office.
An Oral Argument is “oral” meaning you make it in person and verbally. You would go before the Board and verbally tell them which way you want them to decide. They may ask you questions as to why you take your position.
If you ask for an Oral Argument, you may want to send written argument in support of the Oral Argument. The Written Argument will go through all of what you want to say. The reason that you would still want the Oral Argument is so that you can answer any questions the Board might have and verbally persuade them past their disagreements.
You can submit a Written Argument alone. This is more common. Most people do not do arguments at all. But those that do make arguments, it is usually a written argument.
For a Written Argument, I would suggest that you gave a few different parts.
1. You should start out by stating what you want to Board to do. “Please affirm the ALJ’s decsision. . .” Or “Please reverse the ALJ’s decision. . .”
2. Statement of Facts: You should include a Statement of Facts. In this section, you should take your story and tell it again in a way that will support your position. Of course, you must make sure that you keep to the facts that were actually shown at the hearing.
3. Issues: You should have an Issues section. “The issue is whether the ALJ was wrong when he . . .”
4. Reasoning: You should have an Reasoning or Argument section. In this section, you contrast or compare previous cases. You show your logic as to why the ALJ was right or wrong.
5. Conclusion: Wrap it up and briefly summarize why the Board should find in your favor.
If the Employer did not have an attorney, it is hard to make an argument. The problem is that the rules say that if they do not have an agent/attorney, you have to ask their permission for the Board to consider your argument.
If the Employer does have an agent/attorney, it is easier. All you have to do in that case is to send (1st class mail is okay) the attorney a copy of your argument before the deadline. Then you write a letter confirming that you did send a copy to the Employer. Include the date of when you sent it and how you sent it.
If the Employer did not have an agent/attorney, in my experience, there is no use in writing an argument because you cannot make the Employer agree to let the Board consider your argument. The Employer will probably just ignore your request. Why would they assist you? They want you to lose.
Unfortunately, the Advocacy Program does not pay for representation to the Board of Review. The Advocacy Program will pay for your hearing, but not past that stage. So you have some options. The First Option is to do nothing after you appeal to the Board. Once you have requested the Board to consider the ALJ’s decision, they will do that. You do not have to do anything else.
The Second Option if you want to have an argument is to write it yourself. You can get the transcript of your hearing either from the Board or from your agent/attorney.
The Third Option is hire someone to write it for you. I have no idea how much the average price of that is (I have spoken to me about prices that are much higher than me.) Ask your advocate/attorney if he is willing to write the argument for you, because not all Advocates do that kind of thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)